A static VAR compensator (SVC) is a set of electrical devices for providing fast-acting reactive power on high-voltage electricity transmission networks.[1][2] SVCs are part of the flexible AC transmission system[3][4] device family, regulating voltage, power factor, harmonics and stabilizing the system. A static VAR compensator has no significant moving parts (other than internal switchgear). Prior to the invention of the SVC, power factor compensation was the preserve of large rotating machines such as synchronous condensers or switched capacitor banks.[5]
Static Var Compensators Pdf Download
DOWNLOAD: https://ssurll.com/2vFkdJ
Generally, static VAR compensation is not done at line voltage; a bank of transformers steps the transmission voltage (for example, 230 kV) down to a much lower level (for example, 9.0 kV).[5] This reduces the size and number of components needed in the SVC, although the conductors must be very large to handle the high currents associated with the lower voltage. In some static VAR compensators for industrial applications such as electric arc furnaces, where there may be an existing medium-voltage busbar present (for example at 33 kV or 34.5 kV), the static VAR compensator may be directly connected in order to save the cost of the transformer.
They are, in general, cheaper, higher-capacity, faster and more reliable than dynamic compensation schemes such as synchronous condensers.[7] However, static VAR compensators are more expensive than mechanically switched capacitors, so many system operators use a combination of the two technologies (sometimes in the same installation), using the static VAR compensator to provide support for fast changes and the mechanically switched capacitors to provide steady-state VARs.
Reactive power compensation is a very important issue in the expansion planning and operation of electrical power systems. Traditional solution of the compensation is to use fixed-capacitors or reactors for providing and absorbing reactive power respectively (Miller 1982; De La Rosa 2006). Another way of the compensation is to use static VAr compensator (SVC) to compensate reactive power. Since SVC system is fast, smooth and reliable, it has been widely used in power systems (Gelen and Yalcinoz 2010; Mathur and Varma 2002; Lee et al. 2001; Uzunoglu and Onar 2008).
Simulation is modeled and performed three different static load groups separately. Load values, SVC settings and results obtained for simulation are given as tables. In order to obtain the effects of the SVC system, simulations are performed separately for the two different states. First it is assumed that there is no SVC in the system. Then, the SVC is put into the system. According to the before and after compensation, fundamental components of voltage and currents are measured and calculated by using both Goertzel and FFT algorithms separately. The structure diagram of simulation study is given Fig. 1.
Static Var Generator (SVG) also known as active power factor compensators (APFC) or instantaneous stepless reactive power compensators are the ultimate answer to power quality problems caused by low power factor and reactive power demand for a wide range of segments and applications.
Abstract:In the current age, power systems contain many modern elements, one example being Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices, which play an important role in enhancing the static and dynamic performance of the systems. However, due to the high costs of FACTS devices, the location, type, and value of the reactive power of these devices must be optimized to maximize their resulting benefits. In this paper, the problem of optimal power flow for the minimization of power losses is considered for a power system with or without a FACTS controller, such as a Static Var Compensator (SVC) device The impact of location and SVC reactive power values on power system losses are considered in power systems with and without the presence of wind power. Furthermore, constant and variable load are considered. The mentioned investigation is realized on both IEEE 9 and IEEE 30 test bus systems. Optimal SVC allocation are performed in program GAMS using CONOPT solver. For constant load data, the obtained results of an optimal SVC allocation and the minimal value of power losses are compared with known solutions from the literature. It is shown that the CONOPT solver is useful for finding the optimal location of SVC devices in a power system with or without the presence of wind energy. The comparison of results obtained using CONOPT solver and four metaheuristic method for minimization of power system losses are also investigated and presented.Keywords: power system losses; SVC devices; wind energy; optimal location; CONOPT solver; metaheuristic methods
The SVC PLUS is an advanced STATCOM (static synchronous compensator). By using the voltage-sourced converter (VSC) technology based on Siemens Energy modular multilevel converter (MMC) design, it offers high economical and technical flexibility by its modular design. The footprint of an SVC PLUS installation is smaller than a conventional SVC installation of the same rating, by up to 50 percent.
The SVC PLUS is an advanced STATCOM (static synchronous compensator). By using the voltage-sourced converter (VSC) technology based on Siemens Energy modular multilevel converter (MMC) design it offers high economical and technical flexibility by its modular design. The footprint of an SVC PLUS installation is smaller than a conventional SVC installation of the same rating, by up to 50 percent.
With SVC PLUS, Siemens Energy further enhanced the capabilities of a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) with modular multilevel converter (MMC) technology. Whenever your applications require a highly dynamic solution for voltage regulation, the modular multilevel system SVC PLUS is the right choice. 2ff7e9595c
コメント